Government Contracting
“Buy America”
Policymakers periodically push measures intended to limit government contracts to companies that manufacture products made with a certain percentage of domestic content – some proposals have gone as high to require 100 percent. Examples of discriminatory domestic content provisions were recently seen in President Obama’s proposed America Jobs Act and in legislation introduced by Congressmen Nick Rahall (D-WV).
OFII opposes domestic content restrictions because they result in costly and unrealistic new regulations for small businesses and multinational companies whose businesses rely on global supply chains. This may cause companies to leave the U.S. market resulting in increased costs being passed along to the U.S. taxpayer. The restrictions are opposed by a broad coalition of domestic and international companies as well as several trading partners.
OFII DOCUMENTS:
OFII Letter to Senate Leadership Opposing Buy America Amendment, March 13, 2012
OFII Letter to House Members Opposing Buy America Amendments, February 17, 2012
Coalition Letter Opposing Buy America Provisions in American Jobs Act, October 6, 2011
Coalition Letter Opposing 'Buy America' Provisions in the Asstance, Quality & Affordability Act, July 29, 2010
Dartmouth Economics Professor Warns Chairman Frank about Buy America, February 6, 2009
Coalition Letter to President Obama Opposing Buy America Provisions in Stimulus Bill, February 4, 2009
OFII President's Buy America Letter to the Editor, The Hill Newspaper, February 2, 2009
Department of Defense Press Release on Marine One Contract; Jan. 28, 2005
GOVERNMENT CONTRACTING
From performing advanced research in clean energy technology to providing the latest defense technologies and supplying emergency vaccines, U.S. subsidiaries actively partner with the U.S. Government on issues of critical importance. Although U.S. subsidiaries employ millions of American workers, their “foreign” heritage is frequently leveraged against them to overturn existing contracts or deny access to new government contracts. OFII opposes such discriminatory restrictions and works to ensure an open, competitive U.S. procurement process.
Read More...Policymakers periodically push measures intended to limit government contracts to companies that manufacture products made with a certain percentage of domestic content – some proposals have gone as high to require 100 percent. Examples of discriminatory domestic content provisions were recently seen in President Obama’s proposed America Jobs Act and in legislation introduced by Congressmen Nick Rahall (D-WV). OFII opposes domestic content restrictions because they result in costly and unrealistic new regulations for small businesses and multinational companies whose businesses rely...
Read More...OFII advocates for non-discriminatory treatment of foreign companies and their U.S. subsidiaries in the bidding process for the management of state and local infrastructure projects, including public-private partnerships. Recent examples of PPPs where discriminatory, anti-Insourcing rhetoric was employed in the debate includes the Pennsylvania Toll Road project in 2008.
Read More...The U.S. Department of Energy (DOE) issued a funding notice (FOA) in June 2009 blocking Insourcing companies from applying for projects $150 million in R&D funding through the ARPA-E program. OFII worked to educate the DOE and Members of Congress about the negative consequences of cutting out American Insourcing companies. In late 2009, the DOE officially stated that Insourcing companies were eligible to bid for future rounds of the program.
Read More...The United States Department of Agriculture's (USDA) Rural Development Program is tasked with improving rural America by distributing loans and grants. One such program, the Repowering Assistance Program, makes payments to those biorefineries that use renewable biomass over fossil fuels when choosing a fuel source to power their facilities. According to Section 9004 of the Repowering Assistance Program, a biorefinery is only eligible to receive grant money if it is at least 51% owned by U.S. citizens or U.S. nationals. Many U.S. subsidiaries employ tens of thousands of U.S. workers, invest into...
Read More...
