The
News and Observer
Editorial
by Michael J. Walden
February 2, 2004
A Potent 'Insource'
of U.S. Jobs
RALEIGH -- Recent headlines have raised concerns
about "outsourcing," or the movement by
U.S. companies of jobs to foreign countries. Some
prominent tech companies are considering moving thousands
of well-paying programming positions overseas,and
we've also heard about customer service jobs being
sent to India.
While outsourcing has captured current attention,
it is not a new phenomenon. If the term is defined
as jobs operated by U.S. companies in foreign countries,
the current total is 10 million positions, or 7 percent
of domestic U.S. employment. Further, there's been
an upward trend in the number of outsourced jobs since
the mid-1990s, when trade barriers were significantly
reduced following the signing of the NAFTA and GATT
agreements.
What is less well publicized and understood is that
"insourcing" also occurs in our economy.
Insourcing happens when foreign companies establish
jobs in the United States.
The latest statistics show insourcing accounts for
over 6.5 million jobs nationwide. Although this is
less than the number of outsourced jobs, the gap has
actually narrowed in the past quarter century. That
is, there's been a recent trend of foreign companies
adding jobs in the U.S. faster than U.S companies
have increased jobs in foreign countries.
Consider what's happened in heavy manufacturing,
which includes the manufacturing of vehicles, computers,
electronics and other machinery. Since the mid-1990s,
foreign companies have added 400,000 jobs in these
industries in the U.S. Over the same time period,
U.S. companies moved 300,000 jobs to foreign countries
in the same sectors. The insourced jobs in these industries
are also high-paying, with average compensation per
employee of over $ 65,000.
Insourcing also plays an important role in the North
Carolina economy. The most recent data show 240,000
insourced jobs in North Carolina, with 100,000 in
manufacturing. And the total number of insourced jobs
in North Carolina has risen in recent years.
With an increasingly globalized economy, more and
more jobs will be candidates for both outsourcing
and insourcing. The jobs most vulnerable for outsourcing
are those performing routine tasks, not requiring
close supervision, and where lower-cost foreign labor
is readily available.
For example, 20 years ago computer programming was
a new and cutting-edge job. Today, many programming
tasks are straightforward and routine, and millions
of workers worldwide have been trained to do them.
These are the kind of technical jobs that can go to
foreign nations with lower costs.
But as the recent experience with heavy manufacturing
indicates, the U.S. is still an attractive location
for the siting of plants matching advanced technology
and equipment with highly skilled labor and modern
research. Foreign companies looking for such ingredients
know they can be found in the U.S. and, I might add,
in North Carolina.
The scorecard on job outsourcing versus job insourcing
has actually moved in the favor of the U.S. in recent
decades, and policy-makers must consider both when
evaluating the worldwide movement of jobs. Jobs increasingly
are up for grabs in a new world without economic borders.
Yet the implication for American workers is the same
as my father gave me years ago: to get a good-paying,
you must get an education. The updated version is:
to get and keep a good-paying job, you must get more
and more education.
(Michael L. Walden is a William Neal Reynolds
distinguished professor in the department of agricultural
and resource economics at N.C. State University.)
Copyright © 2004 The News and Observer